ProPublica Report on Collins' Ties to Prison-Bound Donor Roils Maine Senate Race
A ProPublica report published Tuesday says the FBI in 2024 planned to open a broader bribery investigation into Sen. Susan Collins' dealings with Navatek, a Hawaii defense contractor whose executives were major donors to her campaign. The probe never launched after President Trump took office in 2025, and ProPublica reports the two investigators pushing for it were fired or pushed out as part of a wider purge of agents who had worked on prior probes of the president or other officials.
According to the report, the head of a Collins super PAC met with Navatek executives in 2019 and asked for a $500,000 donation. The company's CEO, Martin Kao, sent an initial $150,000 through a shell company. Kao is now serving a federal prison sentence for money laundering, bank fraud and defrauding the government. At the time, Collins was the top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, which she now chairs, and ProPublica says her office steered millions in federal contracts to Navatek, including an $8 million Navy-funded project to build a 3D-printed boat through a University of Maine engineering center.
Maine Democrats held a news conference near Collins' Portland office on Wednesday, with the state party's executive director calling for "clear and real answers." Democratic Senate candidate Troy Jackson, who is challenging Collins in November, called the allegations "corruption of the highest order." Collins' office and FBI officials have called the report "completely false," saying prior investigations already cleared the senator and her staff of wrongdoing. The story broke six weeks before Election Day, in a race Democrats are targeting as part of their push to retake the Senate.
What supporters say:
ProPublica's timeline, drawn from internal company emails and donor records, documents a specific sequence: a PAC ask for a large donation, a shell-company payment, and millions in contracts steered to the same donor.
Two federal investigators reportedly believed they had enough evidence in 2024 to open a broader bribery probe before losing their positions after the administration change.
Collins' role atop the Appropriations Committee gave her direct influence over the kind of defense funding Navatek received, a fact critics say deserves closer public scrutiny regardless of the probe's outcome.
What critics say:
Collins' office and FBI officials say completed investigations already found no wrongdoing by the senator or her staff.
Martin Kao's criminal conduct was his own; ProPublica's account does not show Collins personally directing funds in exchange for the donations.
The report's release six weeks before a competitive election raises fair questions about political timing, and Democrats have an obvious incentive to amplify it.
What's your take?
Should Sen. Collins be required to publicly detail what she knew about the Navatek donations and contracts? Yes 
No 
Other 
Sources:
AP via U.S. News: Maine Dems Hammer Collins Over Report of Pay-to-Play Probe
Maine Public: Democrats Accuse Susan Collins of 'Corruption'
#SusanCollins #MaineSenate2026 #Midterms2026 #ProPublica #PublicOfficialConduct
Now let's hear from you.
You get one Take and 3 ratings so use them well.
Strong arguments beat loud ones. See Moving The Needle (How to)
Don't forget to rate your own Take.
Please don't feed the trolls.
